Growth & Strategy
Every SaaS founder I know drowns in analytics tools. Mixpanel, Amplitude, Hotjar, Google Analytics, Segment, PostHog—they've got more dashboards than actionable insights. They can tell you that 23.7% of users clicked a specific button, but they have no idea why half their trial users disappear after day two.
I used to be the same way. When I started working with B2B SaaS clients, I'd set up elaborate tracking systems with dozens of events and beautiful conversion funnels. We'd spend hours analyzing user behavior data, A/B testing every button color, and obsessing over cohort retention charts.
But here's what I discovered: most usage analytics tools are designed for consumer products, not B2B SaaS. They're optimized for understanding millions of users doing simple actions, not hundreds of users trying to solve complex business problems.
After working with multiple SaaS companies struggling with user engagement despite having "world-class" analytics setups, I realized we were measuring the wrong things entirely. The data was making us dumber, not smarter.
Here's what you'll learn from my experience:
Walk into any SaaS company and you'll see the same pattern: walls of monitors displaying colorful dashboards, Slack channels flooded with automated analytics reports, and product managers who can quote engagement metrics but can't explain why users actually succeed or fail.
The analytics tool industry has convinced SaaS founders that more data equals better decisions. So companies install everything:
This approach works brilliantly for consumer apps. When you're optimizing a social media feed for millions of users, tracking every tap, swipe, and scroll makes perfect sense. User behavior is predictable, actions are simple, and success is easy to measure.
But B2B SaaS is fundamentally different. Your users aren't mindlessly scrolling—they're trying to solve real business problems. They don't use your product for entertainment; they use it to get work done. When they struggle, it's not because your button is the wrong shade of blue—it's because they don't understand how your solution fits their workflow.
Yet somehow, SaaS companies keep applying consumer analytics methods to business software. The result? You end up with detailed data about user clicks but zero insight into user success.
Who am I
7 years of freelance experience working with SaaS
and Ecommerce brands.
My wake-up call came from a B2B SaaS client who had what looked like incredible user engagement data. Their analytics dashboard was gorgeous—perfect retention cohorts, high daily active user rates, tons of feature adoption. But their business was struggling.
When I dug deeper, I discovered the problem: their "highly engaged" users were actually deeply confused. They were clicking around frantically trying to figure out how to accomplish basic tasks. All that activity registered as engagement, but it was actually frustration.
The real users who successfully implemented the tool were showing up as "low engagement" because they'd figured out the efficient path to value. They'd log in, complete their task in a few clicks, and log out. Meanwhile, struggling users generated tons of events by wandering through features they didn't understand.
This was my "aha moment": traditional usage analytics optimize for activity, but B2B SaaS success comes from efficiency. A successful user should actually generate fewer events over time, not more.
That's when I realized we needed to completely flip our measurement approach. Instead of tracking what users were doing, we needed to track whether users were succeeding. Instead of measuring engagement, we needed to measure effectiveness.
The client's data was making us focus on the wrong users and optimize for the wrong outcomes. We were building features to increase clicks when we should have been building features to decrease the number of clicks needed to get value.
My experiments
What I ended up doing and the results.
After this revelation, I developed what I call the "Success Analytics" framework. Instead of tracking user behavior, it tracks user outcomes. Here's exactly how it works:
Step 1: Define Success Moments, Not Usage Events
First, forget about tracking button clicks and page views. Instead, identify the 3-5 moments when users actually achieve meaningful outcomes with your product. For a project management tool, this might be "first project completed" or "team member successfully onboarded." For a CRM, it could be "first deal closed" or "sales process documented."
Step 2: Measure Time-to-Value, Not Time-in-Product
Traditional analytics measure session duration and page views as positive signals. Success analytics flips this: how quickly can users achieve their desired outcome? If it takes users 47 steps to complete a task this month versus 23 steps next month, that's improvement—even if total engagement goes down.
Step 3: Track Skill Development, Not Feature Adoption
Instead of celebrating when users try new features, track when users become more efficient with existing features. A user who can accomplish the same task with fewer clicks over time is gaining mastery. Feature adoption without proficiency is just confusion.
Step 4: Build Progress Indicators, Not Activity Dashboards
Create dashboards that show user progress toward goals, not just user activity. Show "John completed his first automated workflow" instead of "John clicked 47 buttons this week." Progress indicators help both users and your team understand actual advancement.
Step 5: Implement Outcome Surveys, Not Satisfaction Surveys
Stop asking "How was your experience?" Start asking "Did you accomplish what you came here to do?" and "How difficult was it to achieve your goal?" Outcome-focused surveys provide actionable insights for product improvement.
The Technical Implementation:
You don't need expensive analytics tools for this approach. Most of this can be built with simple database queries and custom dashboards. The key is defining success metrics that align with actual business value, not vanity metrics that look impressive in reports.
The results of implementing Success Analytics have been consistently revealing across multiple SaaS clients:
Product Decision Clarity: Teams stopped building features to increase engagement and started building features to increase efficiency. This led to simpler, more focused products that users actually preferred.
Onboarding Transformation: By tracking time-to-first-value instead of completion rates, we identified onboarding bottlenecks that traditional analytics missed. Users were "completing" onboarding without actually learning to use the product effectively.
Support Cost Reduction: Understanding user skill development helped predict support needs. Users stuck at certain proficiency levels could be proactively helped before they submitted tickets or churned.
Retention Prediction Accuracy: Success metrics predicted churn 2-3 weeks earlier than traditional engagement metrics, allowing for more effective retention interventions.
Most importantly, teams felt more confident about product decisions because they understood the "why" behind user behavior, not just the "what."
Learnings
Sharing so you don't make them.
My playbook, condensed for your use case.
For SaaS startups implementing Success Analytics:
For ecommerce businesses adapting this approach:
What I've learned
© Complice.work. 2025.
© Skyward Studio. Built by Nikolai Bain.
Powered by Webflow.
