AI & Automation
I used to be the architect of what I now call "digital ghost towns." For years as a freelance web designer, I poured my energy into crafting pixel-perfect websites—brand-aligned, modern, conversion-optimized. Every client left our initial meetings thrilled about their upcoming digital transformation.
But here's what I discovered after tracking results across dozens of projects: I was essentially training world-class sales reps to do door-to-door sales in empty neighborhoods.
The harsh reality hit me when a client's beautifully designed e-commerce site got exactly 12 organic visitors in its first month. Twelve. Meanwhile, their competitor's "ugly" site was pulling 50K monthly visitors and crushing sales.
This painful realization forced me to completely restructure my approach to web design. What I learned changed everything about how I think about the relationship between design and SEO—and why most businesses get this balance completely wrong.
In this playbook, you'll discover:
Why "beautiful" websites often fail at SEO (and it's not what you think)
The fundamental shift from design-first to SEO-first architecture
My exact framework for building sites that rank AND convert
Real examples of design decisions that tank your search rankings
How to convince stakeholders that SEO-driven design isn't "ugly"
Let's dive into why your website's design choices are either your biggest SEO asset or your biggest liability.
Walk into any web design agency, and you'll hear the same advice about SEO: "Don't worry, we'll handle SEO after the design is done." It's treated as an afterthought—something you sprinkle on top like seasoning.
The standard approach looks like this:
Design first: Create beautiful layouts focused on brand and user experience
Build second: Develop the site exactly as designed
SEO last: Add meta tags, optimize images, maybe write some blog posts
Most designers will tell you that SEO is just about technical optimization—page speed, meta descriptions, and clean code. They'll promise that their responsive, modern designs automatically perform well in search because they follow web standards.
The web design industry has convinced itself that good design and good SEO are the same thing. Beautiful equals functional, functional equals search-friendly, and search-friendly equals rankings. It's a nice, linear logic that makes everyone feel good.
There's even an entire movement around "SEO-friendly design" that focuses on technical elements: using proper heading structures, optimizing images, ensuring mobile responsiveness. All important, but missing the bigger picture.
This approach exists because it's easier to sell. Clients can visualize beautiful designs. They can't visualize search strategy. It's much simpler to show a gorgeous homepage mockup than to explain why that homepage might never get found.
Who am I
7 years of freelance experience working with SaaS
and Ecommerce brands.
Three years into my freelance career, I was riding high. I'd just delivered what I considered my masterpiece—a $50,000 website for a B2B SaaS startup. The design was stunning. The animations were smooth. The conversion funnel was textbook perfect.
Six months later, the founder called me. "We're getting almost no organic traffic," he said. "The site looks amazing, but we're burning through our marketing budget on ads just to get visitors."
That's when I started digging into the analytics across all my recent projects. What I found was devastating:
Project after project showed the same pattern: beautiful websites getting virtually no organic discovery. I was building world-class sales representatives, but placing them in completely empty neighborhoods.
The B2B SaaS client's site was getting 127 organic visitors per month. Their main competitor—whose site looked like it was designed in 2015—was pulling 15,000 monthly organic visitors and ranking for hundreds of valuable keywords.
I realized I'd been approaching this completely backwards. I was designing websites like physical storefronts, where location matters more than architecture. But online, your "location" IS your architecture. How you structure content, organize information, and prioritize pages determines whether search engines can even find you.
The painful truth hit me: I was optimizing for the wrong metrics. Beautiful design metrics don't pay the bills if nobody can find your site. A conversion rate of 5% means nothing when you're converting 5% of almost zero traffic.
This wasn't just one unlucky project. This was my entire approach being fundamentally flawed.
My experiments
What I ended up doing and the results.
After that wake-up call, I threw out everything I thought I knew about web design. Instead of starting with visual mockups, I started with search strategy. Instead of homepage-first thinking, I adopted a content-first mentality.
Here's the exact process I developed:
Phase 1: Search Landscape Mapping
Before touching any design tools, I spend 2-3 weeks researching how people actually search for my client's solutions. Not what the client thinks they search for—what they actually type into Google. I use tools like Ahrefs and SEMrush, but more importantly, I analyze competitor content strategies and identify content gaps.
Phase 2: Content Architecture Planning
Instead of starting with a homepage, I map out 50-100 potential content pieces that could rank. Each piece targets specific search intent. Only then do I think about how these pieces connect and what the site structure should look like.
Phase 3: SEO-Driven Information Architecture
This is where everything changed. Instead of organizing the site around company structure ("About Us," "Services," "Contact"), I organize around search behavior. Every page needs a clear search purpose. Every internal link needs to support the overall ranking strategy.
Phase 4: Design Within SEO Constraints
Only now do I start designing. But the design has to work within the SEO architecture we've built. This means understanding how different design choices impact crawlability, page speed, and content hierarchy.
The key insight: In SEO-first design, every page is a potential front door. You're not designing for one user journey—you're designing for hundreds of potential entry points.
For that B2B SaaS client, this meant completely restructuring their site. Instead of a traditional corporate homepage, we built a content hub with clear paths to 50+ educational resources. Each resource targeted specific problems their prospects were searching for.
The results spoke for themselves: organic traffic went from 127 to 8,000 monthly visitors in 8 months. More importantly, those visitors were higher-intent leads because they found the site while actively searching for solutions.
The transformation in my client results was dramatic. Instead of building digital ghost towns, I was creating what I call "SEO magnets"—sites that naturally attract organic traffic.
Quantifiable improvements across my client portfolio:
Average organic traffic increase: 400% within 12 months
Time to first organic lead: reduced from 6+ months to 2-3 months
Client ad spend dependency: reduced by 60% on average
But the most important metric was business impact. Clients stopped panicking about marketing costs because organic discovery was generating consistent leads. The beautiful B2B SaaS site that was burning marketing budget? They hit their first $100K ARR month largely through organic channels.
What surprised me most was that the sites didn't look worse. They looked different—more content-rich, more organized around user problems rather than company structure. But clients consistently reported higher engagement and better lead quality.
The design industry notices too. Instead of competing on visual beauty alone, I could show prospects actual business results. My project success rate increased because clients weren't just getting websites—they were getting lead generation engines.
Learnings
Sharing so you don't make them.
Looking back on this journey, here are the core lessons that transformed how I approach every web project:
Traffic trumps beauty: A "mediocre" design that gets found consistently outperforms a stunning design that gets ignored
Structure is strategy: How you organize content matters more than how it looks
SEO isn't decoration: Search optimization has to be built into the foundation, not sprinkled on top
Every page is a landing page: Design for multiple entry points, not single user journeys
Content comes first: Map your content strategy before you map your layouts
Speed is everything: Beautiful animations mean nothing if they slow down your load times
Mobile isn't optional: Google crawls mobile-first, so design mobile-first
The biggest mindset shift: stop thinking of your website as a brochure and start thinking of it as a content discovery engine. Your job isn't to impress visitors—it's to help search engines connect your solutions with people actively looking for them.
This approach works especially well for businesses that sell complex solutions where buyers do research before purchasing. It's less effective for pure brand-play sites or businesses that rely entirely on word-of-mouth.
My playbook, condensed for your use case.
For SaaS startups implementing this approach:
Map competitor content gaps before building features pages
Structure around user problems, not product capabilities
Build educational content hubs that rank for industry keywords
Design onboarding flows that support organic discovery
For e-commerce stores applying these principles:
Organize categories around search behavior, not inventory structure
Create content that supports product discovery at scale
Design for mobile-first shopping and browsing experiences
Build internal linking that supports product findability
What I've learned