Growth & Strategy
When I was brought in as a freelance consultant for a B2B SaaS drowning in signups but starving for paying customers, everyone was celebrating their "success." Popups, aggressive CTAs, and paid ads were driving signup numbers through the roof.
The metrics told a frustrating story: lots of new users daily, most using the product for exactly one day, then vanishing. Almost no conversions after the free trial. The marketing team was high-fiving over vanity metrics while the business was bleeding money.
What I discovered completely flipped conventional onboarding wisdom on its head. Sometimes the best onboarding strategy isn't making it easier to sign up - it's making it harder for the wrong people to get in.
In this playbook, you'll learn:
This approach isn't for everyone - but if you're tired of vanity metrics and want users who actually stick around and pay, keep reading.
If you've read any growth playbook from the last five years, you've heard this same advice on repeat:
"Reduce friction at all costs." Remove form fields, eliminate steps, make signup as easy as clicking a button. The conventional wisdom says that any barrier between a user and your product is revenue you're leaving on the table.
Here's what every SaaS founder has been told:
This advice exists because it works - for consumer products. When someone's downloading TikTok or signing up for Netflix, friction is the enemy. But B2B software isn't impulse shopping.
The problem? Most founders apply B2C onboarding tactics to B2B products. They optimize for signup volume instead of user quality. They celebrate vanity metrics while their actual business metrics tank.
The result is what I call "drive-by signups" - users who create accounts with zero intention of actually using your product. Your funnel looks healthy, but your bank account says otherwise.
Who am I
7 years of freelance experience working with SaaS
and Ecommerce brands.
When I landed this B2B SaaS consulting project, the client was frustrated despite seemingly good numbers. They were generating hundreds of new signups weekly through a combination of paid ads, content marketing, and aggressive popup campaigns.
The setup seemed textbook perfect: streamlined landing pages, one-click signup, immediate product access. Users could start using the platform within 30 seconds of arriving on the site. The marketing team had followed every "best practice" in the book.
But here's what the data revealed when I dug deeper:
The client had optimized their funnel for the wrong metric. They were measuring signup success, not business success. Most of their "users" were tire-kickers, competitors doing research, or people who clicked by accident.
What made it worse? These low-quality signups were polluting their data. Customer success couldn't identify patterns in successful users because 99% of their users never intended to buy anything.
My hypothesis was simple: if you make it easier for anyone to sign up, you make it easier for the wrong people to sign up. The solution wasn't better onboarding - it was better qualification.
My experiments
What I ended up doing and the results.
Instead of optimizing for more signups, I convinced the client to optimize for better signups. This meant deliberately adding friction to filter out unqualified prospects before they entered the funnel.
Step 1: Credit Card Required Upfront
This was the hardest sell to the client. "We'll lose 90% of our signups!" they protested. That was exactly the point. We implemented a $1 verification charge that would be credited to their first invoice. This immediately eliminated casual browsers and competitors.
Step 2: Qualification Questions During Signup
We extended the signup flow with qualifying questions:
Step 3: Guided Demo Before Product Access
Instead of throwing users into an empty product, we created a guided demo that showed the product in action with sample data. Users had to complete this 10-minute walkthrough before accessing their own workspace.
Step 4: Personal Welcome Call
Every new signup triggered a personal outreach from the founder within 24 hours. This wasn't a sales call - it was a genuine check-in to understand their goals and help them succeed.
The Results Were Immediate
Yes, signup volume dropped dramatically. But everything else improved:
The qualification questions gave us incredible data about our users. We learned that companies with 10-50 employees converting at 10x the rate of enterprise users. We discovered that users with specific existing tools were our best prospects. This data transformed both our product roadmap and marketing strategy.
The transformation was dramatic. Within 30 days of implementing our "harder signup" approach:
Quantitative Results:
Qualitative Improvements:
The quality of our user base completely transformed. Instead of dealing with hundreds of inactive accounts, customer success could focus on 20-30 engaged prospects per week. The personal welcome calls uncovered product insights that shaped our roadmap for the next year.
Most importantly, the sales team stopped feeling like they were bothering people. When they called trial users, they were speaking to qualified prospects who had already demonstrated serious intent.
Learnings
Sharing so you don't make them.
This experiment taught me that optimizing for the wrong metric is worse than not optimizing at all. Here are the key lessons:
The biggest insight? Most B2B SaaS companies have a lead quality problem, not a lead quantity problem. Adding friction might cut your signup volume in half, but if it doubles your conversion rate, you've just improved your efficiency by 4x.
This approach isn't right for every business. If you're in a highly competitive market where users comparison shop, too much friction might lose prospects to competitors. But if you're solving a specific business problem for a defined audience, qualification can be your competitive advantage.
My playbook, condensed for your use case.
For SaaS products targeting business users:
For ecommerce stores with complex products:
What I've learned