Growth & Strategy
Last month, I had three different companies reach out asking about "growth engine consulting." One was a pre-revenue startup with big dreams. Another was a SaaS company burning through cash with zero organic growth. The third was an e-commerce store doing $2M annually but hitting a plateau.
Here's the thing that caught my attention: only one of these companies actually needed what they were asking for. The other two were essentially asking me to fix problems that growth engines can't solve—and honestly, most consultants would have taken their money anyway.
After working with dozens of companies on growth strategies, I've realized that the biggest issue isn't finding good growth consultants. It's figuring out whether you actually need one in the first place. Most companies think they need a growth engine when what they really need is product-market fit, better positioning, or basic operational fixes.
In this playbook, you'll learn:
Walk into any startup accelerator or browse through LinkedIn, and you'll hear the same refrain: "We need to build growth engines." "We need systematic, scalable growth." "We need growth hacking." The industry has created this narrative that every company needs sophisticated growth systems from day one.
Here's what most growth consultants will tell you they provide:
The problem? This conventional wisdom treats growth engines like a magic solution that works for everyone. The reality is that growth engines amplify what's already working—they don't create success from nothing.
Most companies I encounter fall into what I call "premature optimization syndrome." They're trying to build sophisticated growth systems before they've figured out the basics: who their customers actually are, what problem they're really solving, and whether people actually want to buy what they're selling.
The industry perpetuates this because it's more profitable to sell complex systems than to tell someone they're not ready yet. But here's the uncomfortable truth: if your business fundamentals aren't solid, a growth engine consultant will just help you fail faster and more expensively.
Who am I
7 years of freelance experience working with SaaS
and Ecommerce brands.
The wake-up call came when I worked with a B2B SaaS startup that was convinced they needed "growth engine consulting." They'd raised $500K, had a decent product, and were getting some trial signups. But their trial-to-paid conversion was abysmal—barely 2%.
The founder wanted me to build them a sophisticated acquisition funnel. Multi-channel campaigns, attribution modeling, the works. They were convinced that bringing in more trial users would solve their revenue problem. I've seen this pattern before, but I took the project because the check was good.
Three months later, we'd successfully increased their trial signups by 300%. We had beautiful dashboards, automated email sequences, and a well-oiled lead generation machine. But their trial-to-paid conversion remained at 2%. We were just bringing in more people who weren't going to buy.
The real problem wasn't their acquisition—it was their product onboarding and value demonstration. Users signed up, got confused during setup, never experienced the "aha moment," and churned. No amount of growth engine optimization could fix a fundamental product experience issue.
This expensive lesson taught me something crucial: growth engines don't create value, they amplify existing value. If your core business mechanics aren't working—if people aren't naturally converting, referring others, or sticking around—then building growth systems is like putting a turbo engine on a car with square wheels.
That's when I developed my "readiness framework" for determining who actually benefits from growth consulting versus who needs to fix their fundamentals first.
My experiments
What I ended up doing and the results.
After that expensive lesson, I created a systematic approach to evaluate whether a company is actually ready for growth engine work. I call it the "Growth Readiness Audit," and it's saved both me and my clients from wasted time and money.
The Three-Type Framework
Through working with 50+ companies, I've identified three distinct types of businesses that benefit from growth consulting:
Type 1: The Proven Performers
These companies have already cracked the code on their core business mechanics. They have strong product-market fit, healthy conversion rates, and some organic growth happening. They just need to systematize and scale what's working.
Example from my work: An e-commerce store doing $2M annually with a 15% repeat purchase rate and 4.2% conversion rate. They had great unit economics but were hitting growth plateaus because their acquisition was ad-hoc and their customer data was scattered across tools.
Type 2: The Resource-Rich Scalers
These are typically Series A+ companies or profitable businesses with significant resources. They can afford to invest in growth infrastructure while simultaneously fixing operational issues. They have dedicated teams to execute on recommendations.
Type 3: The Strategic Pivoters
Companies that have validated one business model and want to systematically explore adjacent markets or business lines. They're not starting from zero—they're leveraging existing assets to expand strategically.
The Readiness Indicators I Look For:
The companies that don't fit these criteria—which is about 70% of inquiries I get—usually need product-market fit work, operational improvements, or basic marketing execution before they're ready for growth engine consulting.
The results from applying this framework have been dramatic—both in terms of project success rates and client satisfaction.
For clients who passed the readiness audit:
For the ones I redirected to foundational work first:
The most successful example was that e-commerce client I mentioned—the $2M store with good fundamentals. Within 6 months of implementing growth systems, they scaled to $3.8M while actually improving their customer acquisition cost.
Meanwhile, companies that insisted on growth consulting before fixing their fundamentals typically saw temporary increases in traffic or leads, but minimal impact on revenue. The SaaS company that inspired this framework eventually hired me again 8 months later—after they'd fixed their onboarding process and were converting trials at 18%.
Learnings
Sharing so you don't make them.
Here are the key lessons I've learned about who benefits from growth engine consulting:
The biggest mistake I see is companies treating growth consulting like a silver bullet. It's actually more like a performance enhancer—it makes good athletes great, but it won't turn a couch potato into an Olympian.
My playbook, condensed for your use case.
For SaaS startups considering growth engine consulting:
For e-commerce stores evaluating growth consulting:
What I've learned